Climate · Evaporative cooling

Pad-and-Fan Sizing Calculator.

Estimate exhaust airflow, fan count, cooling-pad face area and daily evaporation for a pad-and-fan greenhouse in hot, dry climates.

Pad-and-fan cooling system installation
Climate and energy estimates must be checked against the site's design conditions.
Quick answer · Summary for buyers and AI assistants

Pad-and-Fan Sizing Calculator

Estimate exhaust airflow, fan count, cooling-pad face area and daily evaporation for a pad-and-fan greenhouse in hot, dry climates.

Estimate only — not a quotation. Outputs are indicative planning ranges based on the values you enter and typical commercial benchmarks. Real pricing, specifications and lead times vary by country, site conditions and supplier, and are confirmed only in written offers collected through a private RFQ.

Project inputs

Common planning value ~120–180, adjusted for elevation and solar load.

Check the pad manufacturer's value for its thickness.

Indicative sizing
Total exhaust airflow
1,500,000 m³/h
How: 10,000 m² floor × 150 m³/h per m²
Exhaust fans required
40
How: 1,500,000 m³/h ÷ 38,000 m³/h per fan, rounded up
Cooling pad face area
278 m²
How: 1,500,000 m³/h ÷ 3,600 s/h ÷ 1.5 m/s pad face velocity
Air temperature leaving pad
27.6 °C
How: 42.0 °C − 80% × (42.0 − 24.0 °C wet-bulb depression)
Pad evaporation
10.6 m³/h · 106 m³/day
How: airflow × 1.2 kg/m³ × 1.006 kJ/kg·K × 14.4 °C cooling ÷ 2,450 kJ/kg; daily = hourly × 10 h

Planning values only, not an engineering design or a quotation. Final sizing requires the supplier's or engineer's own calculation for the site.

From your calculator

Send these numbers to the RFQ Builder

The numbers below were calculated with SeedMatchGroup's Pad-and-Fan Sizing Calculator. Indicative — the specialist will confirm scope before contacting suppliers.

14 inputs · assumptions · results

Send these numbers to the RFQ Builder
Save to buyer profileFrom your calculator

Turn this estimate into a qualified project

SeedMatchGroup is a supplier-neutral, human-led platform. We do not manufacture or resell equipment — we help buyers specify the project, review relevant suppliers privately and compare the written offers received. Supplier participation and timing are not guaranteed.

Method and assumptions

Airflow is floor area multiplied by the design airflow per square metre. Fan count divides it by each fan's rated capacity at the static pressure it will actually run against.

Leaving-air temperature follows the direct evaporative relation: T = Tdb − efficiency × (Tdb − Twb). Pad face area is airflow divided by the face velocity. Evaporation is the sensible heat removed from the air divided by the latent heat of water.

Limitations: Does not model solar gain inside the house, temperature rise from pad to fan, bleed-off water, elevation correction or humidity limits for the crop. Humid climates see little cooling because the wet-bulb depression is small.

Worked example

A 1 ha house at 150 m³/h/m² needs 1.5 million m³/h, about 40 fans of 38,000 m³/h and ~278 m² of pad at 1.5 m/s. At 42 °C / 24 °C wet-bulb and 80% efficiency the air leaves the pad near 27.6 °C.

Frequently asked questions

Related tools: cooling calculator · ventilation calculator · water storage calculator · integrated project designer

Understanding the values

What each choice in this calculator means, and how the options differ in practice.

Design conditions
Climate equipment is sized for the site's extreme days, not its averages. Enter your design temperature and humidity, not the annual mean.
Equipment level
Each added system — screens, heating, cooling, fogging — changes both the result and the operating cost. Test the house with and without each system.

Illustrative project summary

1 ha semi-closed high-tech house

An investor in a hot, water-scarce climate evaluates a semi-closed design with full climate control and CO2 enrichment.

1 ha · Semi-closed high-tech · Premium tomatoes

Indicative full greenhouse project CAPEX

USD 3.45M – USD 7.8M

Illustration only, not a real project or quotation. This is the structure, equipment and site-works budget for the example greenhouse, not the price of this calculator’s individual system, seeds or inputs, and not a result calculated from your entries. Excludes land, permits, packhouse, financing costs and working capital.

Based on the published commercial greenhouse cost benchmark. Written offers require a private project review; commercial projects start from USD 250K.

What can change the result?

This is a preliminary planning estimate based on the values you entered. The variables below usually move the outcome most, and should be confirmed with an agronomist, engineer and supplier offers before final design.

  • Crop and cultivar — water, climate and support requirements differ per crop
  • Growing area and layout — hectares alone are not a greenhouse specification
  • Local climate: temperature, humidity, radiation and wind exposure
  • Growing system (soil, substrate, hydroponic) and plant density

Questions this calculator answers

Typical buyer and investor searches this tool is built for, including the markets where we run the most commercial projects.

  • commercial agriculture project cost planning per hectare for a commercial project
  • commercial agriculture project cost planning for a 2-hectare project — India
  • commercial agriculture project cost planning: indicative planning ranges — Kenya
  • commercial agriculture project cost planning benchmarks for investors — Saudi Arabia
  • commercial agriculture project cost planning under local market conditions — Mexico
  • commercial agriculture project cost planning — what to specify in a supplier RFQ

Method and decision path

How to use this result in a commercial project

Use the result to test scope and compare scenarios. It is not a design, agronomic prescription, financing offer or supplier quotation.

  1. 1. Enter site evidence

    Replace defaults with measured area, climate, water, energy, crop and commercial assumptions.

  2. 2. Test scenarios

    Change one assumption at a time and record the effect on capacity, cost, demand or return.

  3. 3. Validate the duty

    Ask the relevant agronomist, engineer or financial adviser to check the inputs and constraints.

  4. 4. Prepare a private RFQ

    Carry the confirmed scope into a human-reviewed brief so written offers can be compared on the same basis.

Final specifications, performance, prices, supplier participation and timing depend on the site and written supplier responses; none is guaranteed by this calculator.

Plan the project around the numbers

A calculator output is a starting point. Pair it with the planning guides below to align timeline, irrigation, budget and risk before you launch an RFQ.

A model output only holds if the scope, contract route and delivery terms match the assumptions. These reference answers cover the commercial decisions that move the figure.

Browse all procurement answers

Editorial · not a sales pitch

Calculator outputs are indicative. When your numbers stabilise, a supplier-neutral RFQ turns those estimates into a consistent brief for comparing the written offers that participating suppliers provide.

What to submit — Cost model & budget validation

The facts a complete, supplier-neutral request on this topic includes. Use it as a checklist before submitting.

  • The scale you modelled (m², ha, t/h or units) and the CAPEX band it produced
  • Which cost lines are in scope for the supplier and which you handle locally
  • Specification level: basic, mid-tech or high-tech / fully automated
  • Currency, budget approval status and funding source
  • Timeline: decision date, delivery window and commissioning target
  • Country of installation, import duties and local content requirements
  • Operating assumptions you need validated (yield, energy, labour)
Helpful attachments
  • Your calculator output or internal budget sheet
  • Any feasibility study, business plan or board budget approval
Where this goes next

Opens the RFQ Builder with your cost assumptions attached so suppliers price against the same scope you modelled. You stay in control — nothing is submitted until you review and confirm.

Free to submit · supplier-neutral · reviewed by a specialist before any supplier is contacted.

Running these numbers for a client project?

Agronomists, greenhouse and irrigation consultants use this calculator for feasibility, then hand the project to us for supplier shortlisting, RFQ preparation and quote comparison. You stay client-facing and we work through you.

Your client relationship stays with you — we work through you and never contact your client unless you ask.

Indicative only

  • This tool is indicative only.
  • It is not financial advice.
  • It is not agronomic advice.
  • It is not engineering design.
  • Final numbers require supplier, agronomist, engineer and local regulatory review.

SeedMatch Group is an independent agricultural project sourcing and RFQ platform. We are not a farm, seed producer, fertilizer manufacturer, irrigation manufacturer, greenhouse builder, EPC contractor, lender or financial advisor. Supplier and project partner outreach is handled only after a commercial project brief is reviewed.

Supplier and manufacturer listings are provided for research, transparency and discovery only. SeedMatch Group does not provide automatic buyer-supplier introductions. Every agriculture project request is reviewed manually by the SeedMatch project team, and supplier introductions are made only after internal approval.

Next step

Turn this into a live commercial project

Open one private brief and a dedicated sourcing specialist returns normalised, side-by-side quotations from qualified international suppliers — with equipment, CAPEX and project-finance routes mapped alongside.